AI and the Legal Profession

 

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been referred to as both innovative and a threat to the status quo.  In the legal profession, its potential to assist lawyers must be evaluated against its potential risks and shortcomings. 

Explaining AI

There are currently many different AI models which cater for various requirements.  In this regard, ChatGPT (GPT) is the most familiar and commonly used AI chatbot.  

With respect to the legal profession AI Legal Assistant (AILA) is specifically designed to assist in legal research, document review and analysis.

GPT and AILA are both generative AI, meaning they generate new content based on prompts given. These AI models are built on large language models (LLM) which are advanced artificial intelligence systems trained on massive datasets of text to understand, summarise, translate, and generate human-like text.

Training

The main difference separating most AI assistants is training. All AI models are trained on LLM’s, whereby they are rovided with data in order to learn and produce results.  

An AI model that is trained on legal cases and documents will be more suited to answering legal based questions rather than an all-round general AI assistant like GPT.

Tailoring

AI models can be tailored to suit different needs. Accordingly, the AI software can be coded to respond to prompts or even modified to determine how it uses logic and reasoning before generating a response.

The responses are also impacted by the prompts provided to the AI assistant.  If the AI is not provided with enough information or a sufficiently specific prompt, it will not produce the desired results.

Security and Confidentiality

A significant concern for lawyers utilising AI is the disclosure and use of confidential information.  Accordingly, lawyers need to be very careful not to disclose confidential information during the provision of information to an LLM. 

Against this risk is the fact that AI tools like AILA have achieved some of the highest security and confidentiality qualifications obtainable.

Conclusion

It is likely that each law firm will have its own personalised AI tool built and trained on the basis of the firm’s data and information. 

Such a development will be very useful in assisting the lawyers at the firm in servicing their clients’ objectives and requirements in a timely and accurate manner.

To learn more about any of the matters discussed here, or if you require legal assistance, please contact Chris Moshidis, Director and Principal Lawyer on +61 3 9521 7956 or chris@urbanlawyers.com.au.